Thanks to the Global Forum, without which there would be no IDC T-building activities; thanks to the brothers in the group: dingjssc, I would not have had the chance to play if my brothers were not here. Let’s stop thanking the country, D, and parents for being so awesome. Aren’t they all useless?
The above is all nonsense, just for fun. Okay, let’s get to the point. Everyone has seen that the title traffic part of Good VPS is written as unknown. The main reason is that this configuration is slightly different from the official XEN256. In addition, IDC does not provide a panel, so the specific traffic is unknown.
First, let’s briefly talk about the configuration of the VPS that dingjssc brother T received. XEN virtual technology, 256MB memory, 256MB swap area, 10GB hard drive, single-core E5620 2.4GHz, 1 independent IP address. Below, are simple test results.
【top】
【CPU information】
【Hard disk capacity】
【Download rate test】
【Disk I/O】
[UnixBench test]
================================================== ======================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: MyVPS: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU /Linux — 2.6.18-238.5.1.el5xen — #1 SMP Fri Apr 1 20:27:35 EDT 2011
Machine: i686 (i386)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8 ″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (6002.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext
23: 04:06 up 1:31, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.03, 0.15; runlevel 3
———————————————— ————————
Benchmark Run: Sat Jun 25 2011 23:04:06 – 23:32:01
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 11216104.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone <x2 > 2191.6 MWIPS (10.3 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput <x2 > < x2> 2325.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 434280.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 120897.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1137373.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput < x2> 653884.6 lps ( 10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 107205.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation <x2 > 4262.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) < x2> 3850.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) <x2 > 531.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 472675.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values < x2> BASELINE <x2 > RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 11216104.4 961.1
Double-Precision Whetstone < x2> 55.0 <x2 > 2191.6 398.5
Execl Throughput <x2 > 43.0 2325.8 <x2 > 540.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 <x2 > 434280.0 1096.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks <x2 > 1655.0 120897.5 730.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks < x2> 5800.0 1137373.7 1961.0
Pipe Throughput < x2> 12440.0 653884.6 525.6
Pipe-based Context Switching <x2 > 4000.0 107205.2 268.0
Process Creation <x2 > < x2> 126.0 <x2 > 4262.6 338.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) <x2 > 42.4 3850.5 908.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 < x2> 531.6 886.1
System Call Overhead < x2> 15000.0<x2 > 472675.5 315.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score <x2 > < x2> 630.3
[Summary]
Through the above screenshots, you should have a preliminary understanding of the performance of this VPS. As you can see, the download rate is as high as 17.5MB/s, which is far higher than the 100M port. Hao VPS tried to compile Junge's LNMP one-click package, which took 27 minutes. Although it was slightly longer than the 18 minutes of the same model of myhost123 tested before, it was still a good speed, and the UnixBenc score was also very high. From the hosting provider's website, you can see that IDC is offering a 25% discount promotion.
[IDC introduction and purchase address]Click directly to the official website of Uno
